1.3.14

Berlinale 64: ...more stories....more films...german vulvae, STASI stuff and hong kong ghosts...


... Just for being sure I shall go straight to Inferno,
at night the various parties of the Berlinale
allowed me to meet a large bunch of friends
from all over the world.

All drunk.

Like my shootings adventures partners
the guys from Noe and AMPM and Gaumont
and other parisian production companies,
Bono Ristori, the theoretician of the living dead,
or L.,
who is always everywhere and always drinks.

From one drink to another,
I managed also to see the not yet legal copy
of an italian film on Eva Braun, by Simone Scafidi, alongside the Archangels that made it possible...
A mature and spungent film,
a sort of “Salo” but in a black comedy key.  
This would be enough to make you go crazy,
but what if I told you there is soooooo much sex in it?
If I told you it has a lot of  Bunga Bunga?

....And soon you might get news about my first film, too...
I mean based on my total story...
If you want to invest on it send me a message...
I’ll send you my IBAN...
It will be a masterpiece!
Suspiria will be just a pale copy of it.

...And then so many other people
I have NOT met... 

....And then I saw that pseudo doc on Nick Cave…
where he sees  a psychiatrist … 20,000 Days on Earth.


The scene with the shrink was revealing:

Are we witness to a confession of vulnerability?

Or the performance of such?

The key of the entire film is only one:
does it matter?

We get a journey through the past,
 
through Berlin
and the silhouette of Mick or PJ Harvey, through Cave's personal archives.

(how he kept all his crap together over his tumultuous life, I have no idea).

Cave, who had once given himself
so totally
over
to drugs and religion,
 
appears here incapable of entirely letting go
of his private being…

A man who wrote a classic song
about a woman as a boat
 
is incapable
of releasing himself...

During the film’s press conference,
co-director Jane Pollard  pointed out
 
that though the film works as a documentary,
 
it isn’t really true…

…that it was edited, with Cave’s approval,
to make him appear more troubled
than the actually was …
 
...or appearing more melancholic
 
than reality.
 
“Nick is a real person,” Pollard noted.
“But the film isn’t very real.”
 

Both the press screening and conference
were only half-attended...
 
... though Cave’s music is played in every bar
from Potsdamer Platz to Friedrichshain
(I guess he lives in Friedrichshain).
 
His life, today,
is one of the bourgeois bohemian.
 
He eats,
he watches TV (Scarface with the kids)
and “mostly, I write”
(by typewriter, of course).
 
Art can provide the rest.
 
Cave explained, “I think cinema was invented
to show violence.
That’s why I got interested in cinema, really.”

And then we all moved on to the next film...

 
…And then the party…

As the Berlinale is also about the sense of community
in the auditorium and the venues,
the shared reactions
with hundreds of strangers. ..

Or about the annoying idiot
who carefully unfolds a coat across four seats
to reserve for friends,
who never show up,
and gets into a bitter altercation with the stressed neighbors...

... Or it's about the awkward Q&As with directors who do not speak any language…
…Or about the applause after each screening,

the sense that this screening
was an event of significance,
that we were all here together

and we shared it…

This is, after all,
the one major film festival in the world
that takes place in a city
where actual people actually live.

… Rather than some remote,
exclusive resort in the Mediterranean,
where the film industry
commits its annual incest...

But the Berlinale is also the place
where I enter parties
for films I haven't seen,
smoke some Gitanes, have some alcooohoool…

…and talk to actors and directors and film producers,

making sure to leave the vague impression

I have seen their film
 
and thoroughly enjoyed it…

…Now THAT'S the true Berlinale feeling (too)...


Now enter the Greeks…


 With a central character called Antigone
(and she has the face for it),
Na Kathese Ke Na Kitas

(Standing Aside, Watching),

directed by Yorgos Servetas,  
picks up on Sophocles’ fearless,

proto-feminist heroine.

 
 

She is here re-presented as a young woman
who returns to her home village
to radically revenge on the male manipulation.
Servetas’ film plays with fable and myth.
He creates everyday situations
that are both archaic and contemporary,
marked by moral compromise.

But if you have to make a choice, though,
Sto Spiti (At Home, Forum, directed by Athanasios Karanikolas—Berlinale 2013)
is an even better matching
of means and substance.
It tells the story of Nadja,
a migrant worker from Georgia.
Set up with rigor, Karanikolas’ camera
works with a maximum of three takes per scene,
towards a sense of

inevitability
in three acts:
exposition, change and consequence.




From up North now…

Norwegian director Hans Petter Moland
brought at this Berlinale
a hilariously dark crime epic:
In Order of Disappearance.

Stellan Skarsgard  plays a darkish, introverted guy,

who goes crazy when his son turns up dead.

He chases a Norwegian Mafioso,

the super hype hipster criminal Greven
(Pal Sverre Hagen),

 in this work half way between a Bronson-

movie and the Italian policiers of the 70’ies.


 The Mafia boss is the best character seen so far at this Berlinale,

a cruel and hectic dandy,

vegetarian,

with the hypest blond reddish beard,

an art and design curator.


Mountains of bodies here,

mountains of bodies there,

whose names are shown by the director

under the sign of their religion

(a sober cross for Lutherans, slavic cross for the Serbians, star of David for the jews, etc.).

And yes, that’s a film to see...

....just that I prefer the american noirs (and from LA),

or some good french policiers...

 


Someone here has to work...


With the exception of Berlinale hero

Lars von Trier,

you don’t see many modern directors concerning themselves

with the dynamics of the office

(fantasies where everyone
is an architect or a baker
don’t count)…

Possibly because so few of them have ever held ordinary jobs.


…and the critics too treat films

on this subject

as if they were deciphering

the religious rituals of the Incas…


 Lee Yong-Seung’s “Ship Bun” follows a student intern

in a Korean office environment.

But it’s mostly about his great initial failure,

which imprints the future

as surely as a loss of virginity.


 
 

Jong-hwan,
whom at first seems
too conventionally handsome
for the role,
does well with a character
whose inner life is so opaque.
He possesses a face
which can quickly shift
between geekiness, arrogance and rage.
Of course, for many,
this is simply life in the 21st century...
 
Re: von Trier… if they should ever consider preceding Nymphomaniac
with an educational documentary,

Claudia Richarz and Ulrike Zimmermann’s
 Vulva 3.0 would work perfectly.
 
The film’s general approach
is one of post-1968 Leftist German feminism, and you’ll never see so many stuffed vaginas! 

But one wishes the approach was a little more celebratory,
instead of getting depressed
at the end
with female genital mutilation…
...it’s like bringing up the SS
during a VH-1 special on David Lee Roth...
There’s sexuality, but no sex here;
The subject may be sensual,
But the filmmaking is not.
One could hardly argue that the vulva is very,
Very important for a lady.
Very, very important.
It’s her penis!
But Vulva 3.0
 
is a little dry...
 
And yet another party…
At the Berlinale Retrospective reception

there isn't normally
a lot of blood on the walls…
You don't see academics
pulling each others hair.
And if you visit the toilet,
there's also an absence
of film archivists
feverishly wrestling 
over crumbs of ketamine
on the floor.
What you get here
is a crowd of middle-aged,
long-haired,
cardiganed film historians.
They all seem to live
under a strict prohibition
on male cosmetic products!!!
 
They debate here
on the latest digital enhancement
of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
and smash the free wine.

Many of them
(for some reason)
smell of carrots.
But this year,
I sensed a discontent
in the herd of the fourth floor
of the Film Museum.
The assembled academics 
wouldn't serve the available pretzels.
They kept glancing at the poster
with this year's theme:
“Aesthetics of Shadow. Lighting Styles 1915-1950”.
Hm.
Now what the hell does that mean?


 
Living with the STASI…
The Stasi legacy is not exactly
fresh flesh, cinematically speaking.
But Annekatrin Hendel’s documentary Anderson
has definitely turned it
into something new.


In a Proustian attempt to unfold memory,
Hendel recreated the East Berlin kitchen
from which Stasi IM
(confidential informant)
Sascha Anderson,
himself a rock-star
moving in dissident circles,
betrayed his dissident hosts
to East German authorities.
Despite this approach,
Anderson remains gloomy
in his rejection not of guilt,
but of his inability to confront it.
Is there a difference?
There is.
And Hendel, the conscious German,
puts her finger on it.
Hendel’s persistent questions
and Anderson’s persistent evasions
form a strange moral vacuum,
at the centre of a disturbing document.

...The Hong Kong bizarre feature “The Midnight After” (Panorama Special)
 
is a sort of “Lost”,
scrambled with “Stagecoach”,
and sprinkled with “Scream”.
Here subtlety is not strong.
Its ensemble cast features a Cantonese Joey Ramone manqué,
named Jan Curious,
whose karaoke version of Bowie’s "Space Oddity”,
sung into a toilet brush,
 
is the high point of the film.
Its plot is relatively simple:
 
the guys board a mini-bus.
 
The bus passes through a tunnel.
Weird shit happens.
Everyone checks their phones.
More weird shit happens …
…that doesn’t seem to have

any connection to the previous weird shit.


 
So…Is it a ghost story?
A horror film?
An environmental parable? 
Everything’s played for laughs

– even rape –

but the tone will quickly shift

into sentiment,.... and out again,

as Hong Kong films often do…
 
…………………….


by GD

23.2.14

My guilty pleasure at the Berlinale: Praia do Futuro



The torments of the young Aquaman...

 

Praia do Futuro opens under the sun of Brasil, and closes in the mist of Northern Germany.
Beyond geography, this passage is quite meaningfull.
 
As at the end of this film by Karim Aïnouz
– departing from some not very solid, but real promisses
- one remains
with the impression
of having assisted to an evanescent film,
untouchable
but joyfull,
just like that final mist...

 
If this film were born on the times of Fassbinder,
it would have been a marvel.
 
Nowadays,
having to adapt
to the zero suffering policy
of the spirit of our time,
it can only pervade into a neither hot or cold...


Praia do Futuro opens with an event:
Brazilian lifeguard Donato (Wagner Moura)
manages to save German tourist Konrad (Clemens Schick)
from a ferocious undercurrent
on Brazil’s northern coast.
 
He saves Konrad, but not Konrad’s friend.

This film has the merit
of avoiding any didascalia
and any pointless explanation.
Its narrative proceeds by lapses, allusions
and sous-entendus.

Praia do futuro is a beach with dangerous waters,
deep and powerfull.
Donato, nicknamed by his younger

 brother “Aquaman”,

reads well

 the rumour of those waves.
 
Water is his vital element

and the sea is his home.

 It is


only when embraced by the sea
 
that he feels
 
in peace
 
with who he is.  

With Konrad,
 
Donato loses himself
 
in the unknown waters of love.  
As Konrad and Donato

immediately become lovers.
 
They fuck and fuck again,

with high mutual pleasure
 
and a certain grace.
When the German goes back

to Berlin,
he takes with

him his Brazilian boyfriend.
Their relationship grows day after

 day.
 
There is little tenderness, though,
or warm gestures between the two.
Konrad and Donato are always fucking,
always rather hard,
in a sort of a very male variety of homosexuality...
... always like in a sort of an untold male competition,
in order to conquer in the couple
the part of the Alpha male...
...Gay sex
as a continuation
of the war
for the male supremacy...

 ...But  no,
don’t you think of one of these gay films from Northern european countries,
mixing homosexuality and fetichistic images, neonazi and neonibelungic or other...

Thank God,
even if this film unfolds most of the time in Berlin,
the director spares us
the sex caves and all the cheap folklore
that comes with it.

He only concentrates on Konrad and Donato, and he is right.

As Berlin does not do good to their story.
 
Donato feels he is lost, rootless,
he left his familly,
his beach,
his work,
and for what?  

For love?

But is this love,
that thing he has with Konrad?

 
Praia do Futuro touches here to sensitive matters...
It obliges us all
to question ourselves
about what is the price
and which exactly are the choices
made for/out of love...

...We do not know why or how,
but Donato and Konrad drift apart...

...and it is in this new kind of strangeness, in this big chill,
that lays the most noble,
and also the thoughest part of this film.
But it is also here
that the film does not dare
to go beyond certain limits.

The Director should have deepened more the scalpel
on that feeling of being lost..
...on those love-affairs
based on flesh
that tend to soften out..
...on the volatillity
of a certain homosexual desire...

But he does not do it.
He does not want to do it,
or he just cannot succeed in doing it...

...As Fassbinder
does not live here anymore,
for a while already...

... and this is the fast cinema of nowadays, mindless,
that has no back thoughts
because thinking
is a disregarded social category...

...so the Director
abandons the battlefield
and
takes his horses back to the stalls...

But whether the men at the center

 of Praia do Futuro
 
are swimming, running, dancing,

 fighting or having vigorous sex,
 
the physicality
 
of their bodies
 
is mesmerizing.

The film can be sensual,
liberating,
dangerous,
or all three…

Produced with german and brazilian funds, Praia do Futuro waltzes
around the themes

that Aïnouz affectionates,

around the humanity on the move  
(Love for Sale,
I Travel Because I Have to see you,
I Come Back Because I Love You...)...
Aïnouz works attentively
on the composition of his frames,
even though some of his choices appear to be just
smashing aesthetics..

 The film ends
 
with a scene
 
as a replica to the first.
 
The two main heroes
 
and Donato’s brother
 
drive furiously bikes on a beach,
 
no more in Fortalezza,
 
but on the shore of the Baltic Sea.   

A scene that confirms
 
the Director’s fetichism

 
for male homosexuality
 
in the biking version:
 
fast wheels,
 
fetichistic overalls

and helmets,   
as a clin d’oeuil to the gay

 cinema classic
Scorpio Rising by Kenneth Anger
 
(accoladed also by Fellini in Roma).
 

It closes with Heroes,
 
in fact with Herden

by David Bowie,
 
shot at a maximum volume,
 
causinng a fast escape
 
to some film critics
 
already irritated
 
by all they had to endure...

This is a massive film,
failed partly
because of its inability of

 narrating,
partly for not having dared.

But there is also
a lot of good story telling here,

...and I am nonchalantly

electing it
as my guilty pleasure
of this Berlinale 64...

 
 
 
 
 








by g d