20.9.13

Everything shines and Rome is a stage (of LA GRANDE BELLEZZA)

Everything shines...
The parties, endless,
the freaks,
the frivolous quotations,
the boredom,
the appalling actress writing a book,
the actor loving Proust,
the lunatic, the poet, the exorcist papal official that only talks cooking books,
the old tv soubrette, the provincial,
the conceptual artist without a concept,
the noble people without wealth,
the nuns,
the ladies,  ...
«O Roma, o morte!», they used to say.
But here everyone is already dead, starting with the japanese tourist that initiates the film.
They all try their best in order to appear alive, they dance, they talk,
but in fact they all know they have “ a devastated life”.  
 Paolo Sorrentino accumulates things and people, annecdotes and masks, in order to offer us a (sacred and profane) representation of the NOTHINGNESS, of Rome,  Anno Domini 2013.
That nothingness to which Flaubert would have liked to dedicate a novel (no subject or context, just style) and to which the ex writer Jep Gambardella has dedicated all his life, becoming “the king of mundains”.
Jep has reached a point in his life when he’s beginning to mourn lost love and missed opportunities. He is a dapper, cultured and dilettantish Roman, always dressed in a fine suit and fine shoes.
 As the film opens, he celebrates his sixty-fifth birthday with a hedonistic party in his flashy apartment which overlooks the Coliseum on one side and a convent on the other.
In his world, the high life meets the low life, writers and thinkers mingle with strippers and models.
 He is a virtuoso of the void.
But he is also the only one knowing for sure that the roman “dolce vita” isn’t even bitter or nostalgical or decadent.
It is just pure vacuity.  
Sorrentino and Bigazzi’s camera seems to be restless.
It jumps in circles, it travels forward, it flies and it captures in its solid squares the characters.
It never tries to arrive anywhere or to multiply. But to keep company, to illuminate the density of a scene...
...and then slides  abruptly towards something else: the flat sea, a silent garden, a statue, a piece of sky.
Why does Jep-Toni Servillo want so much to touch the Great Beauty?
As an epiphany that remained unatteined? That he is unable to record?
So many actors, so many special appearances, so many episodes, so many quotations,  Fellini  but also Scola, sunsets, sunrises and flamingos.
The “so much” and the “too much” are altogether the instrument and the meaning.
The far-too-beautiful rubs up against the overly grotesque.
Quick wit and clever conversation are never far away.
From this nothingness and lack of meaning Jep creates an alibi for his own nullity.
What could take him back, to the initial summits of his life hopes?
A new flash of love for Ramona (a mature sensual woman)?
The quasi real friendship for Romano, as much of a writer as he is?
The decrepit, hyeratique and mute appearance of a “saint” that comes from Africa and looks like Mother Teresa of Calcutta?
There is no Beauty in the splendid Rome of Sorrentino.
Its masters are vulgarity and cynicism, as well as Jeps’.
Who waits for Death as if it meant returning home to the Great Beauty of a sweet and intense love of his twenties…
But over the luminous images of that great beauty, emerges the decline of the African saint.
Her body and her face are tensed in the effort to climb some stairs that should grant her escape from the flames of the Inferno…
And to us it looks like the spasm of Death iself…

A moral languor to bring over vertigo.
 And in the background, Roma,
 in summertime.
Beautifull and indifferent.
Like an expired diva.
And yet...
“the journey that we’ve been given
...is all imaginary”....
by g d
“La grande bellezza”, by Paolo Sorrentino (Italy and France, 2013, 142’)

9.9.13

Of love, sex and loneliness @Venezia 70





Jonathan Glazer had not directed a feature film since Birth in 2004.

 Yet at Venezia 70, he delivered a 3rd hypnotic film, one of the most aggressively arty cinema pieces in ages.

A vision of our world through the eyes of an alien…

This creature (under the rubensian skin of Scarlett Johansson) wonders the Scottish countryside in a truck, looking for isolated men.
The men she meets are bored and horny and can't believe their good fortune.

The alien lures them in with polite, persistent questions, barely hearing the replies.

They are then “consumed” by a viscous fluid…

The routine of these abductions enables an awareness of the world and its people.

Routine is only an impression.

As it increasingly reveals the main character.
She emerges from her torpor only to slide slowly into fear.
She voluntarily loses control.

She wants to “blend” in, but cannot succeed…
The TV set is a mystery to her, and the slice of chocolate cake only sticks in her throat.

Curiosity will end up putting the alien in danger
and reverse the power balance
between the prey and its predator... 

Sensory experiences such as Under the Skin defy mere words.

It feels like a feature-length successor to Scotty's nightmare from Vertigo.
In that  Hitchcock sequence,
James Stewart's Scotty,
driven mad by an obsession over an outstanding beauty
(who was maybe possessed by some extraneous entity),
imagines marching towards her
in the darkness,
eventually falling
into an open grave
and tumbling
into an abyss.

When Johansson's alien leads suitors back
to her place (a cavernous black hole ),
she strips down
while they follow behind in kind,
barely caring,
as they find themselves
submerged in black goop.
while she continues to stroll forward.

Johansson is superb here,
such a convincing seductress 
as the unfeasibly-womanly creature,
inviting normal people
to accept a long awaited sexual oblivion.

“Under the skin” is a combination of a road movie, science-fiction and docu-fiction.

It has numerous scenes filming people walking through the streets, interacting with the American actress without recognizing her.

For these scenes, Glazer and his crew concealed cameras
so as to simulate the actress's "infiltrator" aspect,
rather like an extra-terrestrial
who wanders around our world "incognito".

When she falls head-first on a crowded pavement, passers-by help her to get up,
before resuming their robot-like march…

 From these realistic sequences, the director succeeds in obtaining a cold strangeness.

He leads us between empty seashores and cacophonous nightclubs.

He turns a hidden camera on the streets of Scotland and watches, unnoticed,
as people shop and smoke and tap out their texts.



The film is based on a novel by Michel Faber.

But unlike the book, the screenplay sets aside any kind of justification,
in order to leave intact
the mystery
surrounding the creature.

The filmmaker bets on the viewer's free interpretation.

Under the Skin is about an alien who becomes entranced by her feminine qualities,
 and how powerful they can be.
Only to pay the price for being a woman (or a man) in the world,
looked at
and lusted over,
in increasingly dangerous scenarios.

And then an additional touch of spice is added to the film, all the more intriguing.

A drowning scene leaves a very young child crying alone on a beach.
When the tide turns, the blood freezes, putting us in the position of hostages to our own humanity.
A contagious weakness which will have consequences on the creature, too …

Under the Skin is an icy but heartbreaking parable
of love, sex and loneliness.

...Driving on the road, the alien lady encounters a fellow pariah,
who shops by night
and has no friends.

A little later we shall see this figure again, wandering naked
and bewildered on the outskirts of town...

 ...just another lost soul
who's in search of a home...

Glazer is accessing abstracts
that have no linguistic translation.


Not since Sam Peckinpah
has a director been so surgically precise
with the notion
of emotional violence.

Glazer throws us into a cold black sea
where the only thing that can save us
is a loving connection
to another human being.
 
However, in this harsh world,
human warmth comes at a premium...
... if at all...

Abandonment
becomes a central theme,
and with Johansson’s growing sense of empathy,
the beating heart of the human voyage
becomes more transparent
just as it grows weaker and weaker,
until it disappears completely.

Just as we are submerged, up to disappearance, in (an unilateral) love story...

A bone-chilling piece of cinema
that sinks in,
Under the Skin leaves an unique,
and oddly beautiful,
scar.

by
giulia dobre


Venezia 2013: STRAY DOGS don't bark

Taipei Director Tsai Ming-Liang , a long-standing hero of slow cinema fans, is offering in STRAY DOGS something very different.
This is a meditation on the way time flows through our lives, when seconds can stretch into hours and entire months can be swallowed by a single cut.
 
His film seen now at the 70th Mostra di Venezia marches very much to his own pace and to his own beat.
 
"Stray Dogs" frustrates those looking for answers or traditional narrative, and moves at an especially sleepy pace, with some shots lasting around the ten minute mark.
But those who stayed to the end were rewarded with one of the most distinctive and beguiling films of the Mostra 2013.
Tsai sets the tone for what's to follow with a lengthy shot of a moldy flat, where two children (Lee Yi Cheng and his sister Li Yi Chieh) sleep while a woman, presumably their mother, watches over them, brushing her hair over her face.
Soon, she's gone, and the children are left living in a shipping container with their father .
 
He makes a meager living, most of which is spent on alcohol and cigarettes, holding up an advertising sign in the middle of the motorway.
The children don't seem to be in school anymore.
Instead they spend their days playing and living off free supermarket samples.
 
The woman returns, in a way; two other actresses return as maternal figures, but it's not totally apparent from the film itself that they're meant to be the same character ...
It should be fairly apparent at this point that "Stray Dogs" is not going to be for everyone.
 
This is Art Cinema in very deliberate upper case, with a languid naturalism that creates a mood more dream-like than kitchen sink.
And if the opening shot doesn't clue you in, Tsai is hardly a rapid-fire cutter.
 
But the film is as fully realized and strongly executed.
Every shot feels perfectly composed, while often surprising.
Every time Tsai makes a cut, you can't see how it could have been done any other way.
 
While their sheer duration might test some's patience, while the penultimate scene does seem to go forever,  it turns out to be deeply, deeply moving...
 
So the filmmaking here is almost impossibly well-realized, right down to the evocative sound design.
 
 But the film remains resonant and affecting.
 
 These are high standards to set for anyone, and of all the films I saw in Venice, this is the one that most demands a second viewing: there's an awful lot to unpack here.
 But, if nothing else, you're left with a masterclass in directing, and a film that anyone who's serious about cinema needs to make the time to see.
 
giulia ghica dobre
 
Running time: 136 MIN. Original title: "Jiaoyou"

Production

(Taiwan-France) A Homegreen Films, JBA Prods. production in association with House On Fire, Urban Distribution Intl. (International sales: Urban Distribution Intl., Montreuil.) Produced by Vincent Wang. Co-producers, Jacques Bidou, Marianne Dumoulin.

Crew

Directed by Tsai Ming-liang. Screenplay, Tung Cheng Yu, Peng Fei, Tsai. Camera (color), Liao Pen-jung, Sung Wen Zhong; editor, Lei Zhenqing; production designer, Masa Liu, Tsai; set decorator, Li Yufeng; costume designer, Wang Chia Hui; sound, Mark Ford; assistant director, Feng Fiu.

With

Lee Kang-sheng, Lee Yi-chieh, Lee Yi-cheng, Yang Kuei-mei, Lu Yi-ching, Chen Shiang-chyi, Wu Jin Kai. (Mandarin dialogue)